To push or not to push, that is the question

By | B2B | One Comment

The “Good”– shifting from “push” marketing to “missing link” marketing – meeting the modern customer’s expectation of finding the right information at the right place at the right time.

 

Missing link2Check out the article “Beyond Targeting in the Age of the Modern Consumer by Augustine Fouin ClickZ.   It focuses on consumer advertising and targeting but the lessons definitely apply in the B2B space.   Fou points out the futility of the push or interruption model, even when the target is very narrowly defined. 

 

“So in a simple game of odds, if the advertiser starts with a small target and intersects that with near zero recall or very low response rates, the probability of success (driving the sale) is a rounding error to zero.”

 

This point really hit home with me since a while back we realized our team’s traditional direct marketing model was no longer working.  We sell enterprise security to a very select group of IT executives in F1000 companies (e.g. CIOs in top banks).  While we created some very strong integrated marketing campaigns to reach these highly sought after customers, the messages were probably never received  since our targets have stopped reading emails, answering calls, attending events, reading trade journals and opening mail.  Even in the few cases where we did get their attention, I’m sure we were quickly forgotten in the crush of other marketing messages.  Given this new market reality we shifted the majority of our marketing efforts from traditional direct marketing to what Fou calls missing link marketingdelivering the right bit of information to the right person at the right time through the right medium (when they're searching for it). This solves many of push marketing’s shortcomings since the customer finds information that is relevant to them at their particular stage of the buying cycle. 

 

For example, we put this approach into practice in our marketing efforts to the aforementioned IT execs in large banks.  One of their primary pain points is compliance with identity theft regulations (FFIEC, Red Flags, etc.).  Rather than bombarding them with direct mail/email/calls about our products, we created unique content for each stage of the decision-making process:  a whitepaper on the issue, a podcast, a buyer’s guide to help customers write their RFP, and a webinar with a customer testimonial.  We placed that content on our websiteand on key banking industry portals.   Of course we drove visibility of the content with PR, blogging, SEO, Google Adwords and sponsored links on keywords associated with those regulations.

 

Now we aren’t hitting every single prospect over the head with our messages, but instead are getting the right information to the few who are actively researching solutions in our space.  And I’ll take quality over quantity any day!

The simple things pay off

By | Web Marketing | No Comments

The “Good” – reinvigorating online sales through web design

The other day I was summarizing my team’s accomplishments in 2008 and realized that this was one of the most satisfying.  Not because it involved some incredible strategic plan or creative idea on my part, but rather because it validated that focusing on the simple things can have a big impact on results.

What I’m referring to is a site makeover project for my company’s SSL certificate product line.  Certs are what organizations use to create secure (encrypted) sessions with users…i.e. the user sees https and the little yellow browser lock.  Anyway, we are a smaller player in the market (VeriSign is the 800 pound gorilla) and primarily sell certs the same way we sell our enterprise security software — through our direct sales force. 

During strategic planning last year we identified a significant opportunity to grow the business via the online channel.  The problem was that our site was designed to mimic our enterprise site (www.entrust.com) and was NOT at all ecommerce friendly (i.e. “bad marketing”).  So we executed a plan to completely overhaul the site design and buy process in order to make it easy to buy a cert in just a few clicks.   

Here are the before and after screen captures.

Current_dotnet-home

Cert homepage new

It’s easy to see the huge improvement in design that came from our clear-cut focus on the user and their buying experience.  Of course we also added in lots of SEO, Google Adwords and display ads to drive traffic to the new site.

Our results have been great with substantial increases in unique site visits, conversion rate and most importantly, sales (we’re publicly held so I can’t share specifics).

The key takeaway for me is that you don’t always have to shoot for the stars in your marketing plan – launching an innovative new product, making a big splash at the huge trade show, etc.  Instead, it pays to focus on the simple projects like improving the web design for one of your smaller products.

B2B Marketing Then and Now

By | B2B | No Comments

The "Good" – looking back to see how you've evolved and learned over the years

In the spirit of New Year's and being retrospective, I took a quick look back at my 8 years at Entrust and how we approached marketing then and now.  We've certainly learned a lot since 2001 and are more effective than ever…I just wish we had the same budget as back then ;)  I couldn't figure out how to create a table in this new TypePad editor so you'll need to click on the graphic to view the lessons in larger format.

 B2B marketing then and now

Holiday eCards – the Good, the Bad and the Ugly

By | B2B, Brand, General Marketing | 3 Comments

It's that time of year again when we are inundated with the the good, the bad, and the ugly Holiday eCards.  Here are some I've received in reverse order….

The "Ugly" – creating negative brand perception with a holiday eCard so unimaginative and uninspired that it turns people off.  I’ve received a lot of these this year so maybe the cost-cutting started with creative departments.  I’ll spare you the pain of seeing all of them and use MS&L’s card as the poster child for “ugly” marketing.  Clearly they get paid by the word, but do people really want to read about arcane renaming updates in a holiday card.  I expect a top tier global PR firm to be savvier than this.

 MSLcard

The "Bad" – wasting the time and money to produce a boring holiday eCard.  The companies in this group at least put some effort into their cards, but clearly not enough to make them enjoyable.  They want to do a nice card but just don’t put enough creative energy into making it a positive brand experience for the recipient.  The card from lead-gen firm Madison Logic exemplifies a “bad” card with no music and some scrolling images of the staff…yawn!  Check out the screen shot below, or if for some masochistic reason, you want to see the “live” card then click here.

Madisonlogic card

The "Good" – using imagination and creativity to make a holiday eCard that entertains the recipients and conveys a good impression of your company.  My favorite in this group is the one from The Loomis Agency which uses sock puppets singing a parody of The Carol of Bells.  PMSI created a cool card by mixing holiday tunes and a sketch artist drawing Santa. Check it out here.   And Eisenberg Associates offers up a simple but fun game in their card. 

Pmsi card

Eisenberg card

The folly of the old B2B marketing approach

By | B2B | One Comment

The "Good" -  using a song parody to explain that old ways of marketing don't work

Credit to HubSpot and Rebecca Corliss for this highly entertaining parody of Alanis Morissette's "You Oughta Know."  Check out the video on YouTube and the lyrics below.

 

If I make one more call
I might go punch a wall.
No one understands
That this doesn't work.

They hang up cause I'm a creep.
The mail I send they don't read.
They always find a way to
Ignore me.
I'm interrupting their lives
So they threaten me with knives.
I didn't think that marketing was like torture.

Cause the calls, direct mail
TV ads, they all fail.
And they aren't getting me anywhere. They don't work.
No!
And every time I try to sell
'Didja know that I'm told I should go to hell?
Then I cry. Then I cry.
And you wonder why.

I want leads
To come to me.
Fix our SEO
Get some inbound links.
RSS
Let's get blogging.
Why don't we just use
inbound marketing?
You. You. You. Oughta know.

Get my page rank up.
Tag my content.
Fix my landing page.
Let them come to me.

Now I can blog I can tweet
Publish things you will read.
Won't have to bug you in the middle of dinner.
Google me organically
Search results one two and three.
You need my products? Uh huh. Yeah you'll find me.

Cause the calls, direct mail
TV ads, they all failed.
And they weren't getting me anywhere. They don't work.
No!
And every time I tried to sell
'Didja know I was told I should go to hell.
Then I cried. Then I cried.
And you wondered why.

Now my leads
They come to me
Fixed our SEO
Got some inbound links
RSS
Now we're blogging
Thank god now we use inbound marketing.
You. You. You. Oughta know.

CMO Council research: 2/3rds of us are not effective

By | Sales and Marketing Effectiveness | 9 Comments

The "Bad" – trying to compete with half a team

Cmo_council_report The CMO Council released research, "Driving the Bottom Line from the Front Line" (exec summary here and Marketing Charts summary here), that shows most companies still don't get it when it comes to Sales and Marketing effectiveness and go-to-market strategy.  While the study covers multiple issues with companies' go-to-market capabilities, I was particularly interested/saddened to see that less than 20% say their sales and marketing organizations are extremely collaborative, and moreover less than half have taken any steps to integrate and align the two functions.  That strikes me as a huge opportunity to improve effectiveness and hence competitiveness which ultimately translates into improved market share/revenue/profit/stock price. 

Note the image of the Indy car team on the cover of the CMO Council report.    Per my prior post on this subject (Marketing is a Pit Crew), the pit crew (Marketing) and the driver (Sales) must work seamlessly as one unit in order to get around the track faster than the other teams.  Its a simple concept but takes a lot of planning and hard work to accomplish (otherwise there would be ties every week in NASCAR).  It might be heresy to suggest, but in order to win the race for revenue Sales and Marketing need to be structured, measured and incented as one team, not two.  This idea scares both sides (each fearing subservience to the other) which is probably why so few have taken any steps to formally integrate the functions.

Cool PR Tool

By | PR | 2 Comments

The "Good" – using a tool to assess your press releases

Pr grader I've got a PR team that does a super job of cranking out press releases and pitching stories.  The problem is that we have a press hungry executive team and therefore we don't always have enough time to perfect a release before we have to write/pitch the next one.  I'm in the same boat when it comes to having enough time to review all the content.  Therefore I thought it was cool when I saw this free Press Release Grader tool by HubSpot.  It's not perfect but does enable us to do quick checks of our releases for common mistakes such as too few links, too much content and "gobbledygook" words.  I know we're definitely guilty of using too much generic IT jargon like "scalable" and "flexible" in all our content so it's nice to have the tool point it out.  While we're on the subject, check out "The Gobbledygook Manifesto" by David Meerman Scott and his blog too.    Sadly, we regularly use 8 of the top 20 gobbledygook terms.  Maybe I should have labelled this as a "The Bad" post 😉

More mindless marketing

By | General Marketing | One Comment

The "Bad" - capturing interest, raising expectations and then not delivering

I know this isn't a B2B example but I had to share it given my last post on mindless marketing. I got this email from CitiBank last week.

CitiThe subject line caught my attention…"A Message from Vikram Pandit, CEO of Citi" and got me to open the email which I rarely do.  It must be important if the CEO is sending it to me.

The first sentence kept me interested …"I want you to be among the first to know about the bold steps we are taking at Citi to be the premier, global, fully integrated financial services firm."   Wow, this really must be good stuff to follow.  I can't wait to hear what bold things they are going to do for me the customer!

Oooooops, no bold steps, just their lame marketing drivel …  "Our objective is to create for our customers an experience in which services are seamless, payments and transfers effortless, and distances meaningless."  Truly inspirational stuff ;)  I'm so happy to be a customer of a company that delivers bold services like seamless payments and transfers! 

Seriously, what was the Citi email marketing team thinking when they put this together?  Why in the world would they use their precious CEO equity to send this type of lame message?  What did they want me to take away from this?  Where are the calls to action?  Even assuming they thought this was a meaningful customer communication, why waste the opportunity to take me to a landing page with some cross-sell / upsell offers?  Or, at the very least a customer feedback survey on what services I'd like more info on.  So instead of the intended effect, this email actually gave me a worse impression of the company.

It just goes to show you that even the big companies with the best dedicated staff and agencies can practice mindless marketing. 

Are you a mindless marketer?

By | Demand Generation | 2 Comments

The “Good” and the “Ugly” – sending an educational guide to prospects vs. sending a press release

As a marketing leader at my company I receive dozens of email and direct mail vendor communications every day.  Most are just average, many are awful and a select few are excellent.  Usually I give each a 5 second review and toss them before I even leave the mailroom.  One day last week I got two marketing pieces that I thought I’d share. As background, I’ve never heard of either company.

The first was a direct mail piece with a press release from BZ Media that explained in detail the Bz_letter_front_3 executive  moves/appointments at their publication Systems Management News.  Several questions came to mind as I opened the letter.  Who is the publication and why/how did I get on their database?  Why in the world would they go to the trouble and cost to print a press release and send it to me via snail mail when an email would have been free? [ They have my email address since I also get numerous emails from their sales rep but to my knowledge I have never opted-in.] Why, since I’ve never been a customer would they assume I know who they are?  Why would they think that I would remotely care about their internal management shuffle?    This is classic brainless marketing on so many levels.  Hopefully someone at BZ Media comes to their senses and actually engages me with some type of marketing of value…how about starting with a brief email or letter explaining who they are and how their service would benefit me?  I guess they, and a lot of others, forgot the first lesson of Marketing 101 which is always, always remember to answer the WIFM question!  If a reader can’t discern the value you provide or problem you solve in the first 5 seconds you’ve lost them.

Metrica_2  In contrast, the same day I opened a direct mail package with a 40-page full color guide to direct marketing sponsored/written by MetricaDirect.  It immediately caught my attention as a high-end piece worthy of more than the usual 5 second review and toss.  They rightly assumed that I did not know who they were, so rather than just sending me info on their services they started with a thought-leadership approach to build credibility.  The cover letter was well written and succinctly reviewed WIFM…explaining how the guide would provide proven strategies for solving some of my most pressing marketing pain points.  I’m usually a skeptic when it comes to guides as they typically are company brochures in disguise, but this one is excellent….full of very useful information on demand generation strategy and tactics.  You can download it here.  I was left with a great impression of their company, checked out their website and bookmarked it in my “good vendor” folder (where I keep the only the few vendors I would call when I have a project).

Unfortunately, many in our profession either aren’t trained properly in direct marketing, or are too lazy to do the job right, preferring the spray and pray approach which is a total waste of their budget, and worse, creates a negative brand impression.    It may seem obvious to say, but we need to take the time to understand the prospect’s pain points and quickly communicate how our product helps them relieve the pain (i.e. the value of our solution).  Why do so many people forget/skip this basic tenet of marketing?